Call Options: Part II ... a continuation of Part I
|
motivated by a discussion on the Motley Fool, especially posts on "6/3 strategy" by Sparfarkle
Note that, even if the stock price doesn't change, the value of the option decreases as we approach expiry.
>Yeah, yeah ... so sell it!
That's what we want to talk about ...
We consider the following:
- A stock has a Mean Annual Return is R
- The Volatility (or Standard Deviation) is V
- The Stock Price is P
- We assume a Risk-free Rate of rf
- A particular Call Option has a Strike Price of K and a time to expiry of T.
- For the cost of the option, $C, we'll use the Black-Scholes Option Premium given by:
C = P N[d1] - K e-rfT N[d2]
where
d1 = { log(P/K) + (rf+V2/2)T } / { V SQRT(T) }
d2 = d1 - V SQRT(T)
N is the standard normal cumulative distribution (with Mean = 0, Standard Deviation = 1)
(See Black-Scholes)
|
Here's what we'll do:
- We buy a Call Option which expires in T0 years.
- We pay $C for the option, as given by the B-S formula, above, with time to expiry T = T0.
- After T1 years, we sell the option.
- After T1 years the time remaining (to expiry) is then T = T0 - T1.
- If we knew the stock price at time T1 we could get the price of the option
... to determine if it's worth more than we paid for it !
- We can, however, generate a probabilty distribution for the stock price after T1 years.
>Huh?
Stare at the B-S formula.
If we KNEW the stock price at time T1 (that's P, in the formula), then we know the price of the option, right?
>But, at some time in the future, do we KNOW the stock price?
Let me check.
Just kidding!
We don't know the price, but we can generate a distribution of prices, something like Figure 1A.
>Then what?
Then we see if (at time T1) the call is worth more than we paid for it
With a price distribution (at time T1), that's Figure 1A,
we can to generate an option distribution (at time T1), like Figure 1B.
>Then what?
Then we play with the parameters, like T0 and T1 and K etc. and see what gives us the "best" distribution.
>"Best", meaning the biggest probability that the option is worth more than we paid?
Something like that. In Figure 1B, the red dot represents what we paid for the option, namely $8.00.
There's a 70% probability that the option won't be worth $8 at time T1.
>What's T1?
Figure 1B is just an invention ... to illustrate what we're doing.
|
Figure 1A
Figure 1B
|
>Then what?
Then we pick another option, with different parameters, looking for the parameters that's the "best". In particular, a suggested strategy is to buy a call
which expires in T0 = 6 months and sell it after T1 = 3 months. That's the 6/3 strategy discussed on the Motley Fool.
>Mamma mia! Find the "best"? Normal distributions and stuff!! That's a lot of work! I assume there's a ...
A spreadsheet? It's coming but ...
>How about a real, live example?
Okay. Let's assume that we're considering buying a call where the parameters are:
- Mean Annual Return of the stock is R = 0.08 (that's 8%).
- The stock Volatility (or Standard Deviation) is V = 0.30 (that's 30%).
- The Stock Price is P = $38.
- We'll assume a Risk-free Rate of rf = 0.04 (that's 4%).
- We consider a Call Option with a Strike Price of K = $40 and a time to expiry of T = 0.50 (that's six months).
- The Black-Scholes cost of the option is:
C = P N[d1] - K e-rfT N[d2]
where
d1 = { log(P/K) + (rf+V2/2)T } / { V SQRT(T) }
d2 = d1 - V SQRT(T)
so
d1 = { log(38/40) + (0.04+(0.30)2/2)(0.50) } / { (0.30) SQRT(0.50) } = -0.04145
and N[-0.04145] = 0.48347
d2 = d1 - (0.30) SQRT(0.50) = -0.25358 and
N[-0.25358] = 0.39999
so C = 38 N[d1] - 40 e-(0.04)(0.50) N[d2]
= 38 (0.48347) - 40 e-(0.02) (0.39999) = $2.69
Okay. We've just bought the option for $2.69 and now we look ahead:
We consider selling after three months. That leaves another 3 months until expiry. The value of our option depends upon the stock price at this time.
Things look like this:
The left shart shows the value of our option as a function of the stock price (with 3 months remaining until expiry).
The middle chart shows the distribution of stock prices after 3 months (using a formula described here, somewhere).
The right chart shows the probability that our option is worth less than what we paid. (We paid $2.69)
>There's a 57% of losing money, so a 47% of making money, right?
It's 43%. You're arithmetically challenged! Note, however, that we're ignoring the cost of trading in options
>Is that the "best"?
I have no idea ... yet.
|